A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving possible neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental worries, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has advanced into a really publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building performs at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, look for to make their family members home. The case is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, the place progress pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of established citizens. In accordance with the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being built by their future neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally people of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their planning permission by building a wall past the boundaries of their site, bringing about an encroachment over a Particular Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore parts are subject matter to rigorous controls beneath European and Irish environmental law. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have Long lasting ecological penalties, significantly in the sensitive coastal environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their organizing permission, and say the wall, and that is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has since come to be emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible proof on the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location turned The most putting descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely observed that these types of actions were being cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into an area influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second within the legal René Collier and Paul Feely timeline.
In the Main of your dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that growth at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few merely endeavoring to make a spouse and children house in accordance Together with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches over a Unique Space of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out depending on Qualified advice and accepted strategies. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering The ocean during a storm, don't change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline and also the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up problems. Nevertheless the human component remains central: neighbours who will have to Stay along with each other extensive following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how promptly an area disagreement can escalate when elementary challenges such as environmental protection and property legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a spot of organic attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partially constructed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful issues. No matter if it is going to eventually be altered, removed, or done as planned will rely upon the court’s results. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will most likely keep on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin lately.